As all 4Havocians shld haf known.. recently.. there is some discussion about certain topic of the klass. which supposedly haf strted way back in sec 3.. and tracking back.. it all strted wif one veri person.. initially.. i didnt much bother bout tis issue.. onli some casual talks wen meeting up with frens.. even till the very dae wen i see my name appear on a particular blog.. i did nth much abt it.. i admit tt i did get a little angry over tis matter.. did pour out my feelings to tiff kok and ka.. but i can assure u guys.. nth of such appeared aniwhere else.. in ani forms.. even to anione else.. i told myself tt.. never mind.. freedom of speech is wad is allowed in tis democratic country called singapore.. and we shld respect the existence of such a rule called freedom of speech.. so.. never mind about tt.. if it does makes someone happier by putting someone elses name up on her blog to comment about.. y not?
on 26/02/07.. someone smsed me... "hey! will u b pissed if someone went to ur blog to tag tt u sux and u are a sucker?" my very first thought was tt.. will someone of our age b so childish? but with a 2nd thought.. i thought.. y not? so out of curiosity.. i switched on my dearest com, into my beloved blog.. jux to see some stains on my veri tagboard.. it is at tis veri moment tt i tot.. mayb its time to comment a little of wad is said... and mayb gif a little piece of advise to some ppl whu r blinded to the reality of the world.. but before doing so.. i would like to extend my most sincere apology to xue weijian.. for not turning up on the dae of what is to him the most important reunion dinner.. i m here to apologise not bcux i did sth wrong.. but tt i failed to do the simplest favour for my dedicated friend.. but i hereby would like to sae i did not turn up not cux i didnt wan to.. but i knew i cant.. the fact tt i haf been out late for too mani daes tt week and tt an overnight stay out is something tt is not allowed in our family policy... i m sorry.. but remember.. if i were to turn up for ani upcoming outings of 2D.. it is not bcux of anione.. but u.. cux i know u r trying ur veri best to make the class come together and i promise.. i will try to..
Going back to the recent hot topic.. i seriously nd to sae.. i m nt someone whu knows how to sae no.. and weijian shld noe.. cux i didnt dare to sae no to him wen he asked if i m gng for the dinner.. but some other person whu called, made me said tt 2 letter word.. nt bcux of anithing.. but i seriously find no reason of being demanded to do something.. i believe in this democratic world of ours. we still have the most basic right to make our own decisions.. and whats more.. i owe u nothing.. so i doubt tt u have anithing to demand from me... if i m wrong.. i m sorry but to hereby seek ur forgiveness..
but i would like to appeal to u... to the point tt i seriously hope tt such a childish act will nt carry on.. and tt i wld not nd to type animore entries wif regards to such childish acts of urs... i hope u will understand tt there is no use comparing between 2 classes cux each of the classes haf their own positive and negative points.. and i strongly believe tt nothing in this world is perfect.. unless mayb u tink fairy tales do exist in real world.. the fact tt u may see one class better than the others is bcux u r blinded to the negative side of one but exposed to the negative side of the other.. positive points are much attainable frm the class of 4H and i see no reason whats more to demand.. if u would realise.. its onli u who is moaning and groaning.. and i can tell u.. there is no use in doing so.. i hope u can see the fact tt since others are okay and living on fine with current situation and u cant.. there shld b something tt lies wrong wif u.. and not the class.. i hope u can see tt it is easier for one person to change for the class than for the class to change for one person.. and seriously.. i dun find a necessity for the class to change into a desired outlook of urs... everyone in this world haf different expectations in life.. and we cant possibly satisfy everyone.. u mite sae tis is unfair.. but pls.. its time to tink back.. its time to grow up and graciously accept the fact tt nothing in this world is fair... there is no point moaning and groaning brooding over the past.. time ticks on even without u.. so it is at ur loss if u choose to stick to the fact tt the world shld put on the desired look of urs because.. tis will never happen.. i tink such complains about classes are jux a childish act tt ought to b changed.. haf u ever realise tt u r entitled to tis priviledge to complain abt tis class wif some ppl whu bothers to talk sense to u [which apparently didnt seem to get into ur head].. if tis were to happen in a company tt u r working for.. m i to assume tt u will do the same complaining through blogs and stuffs..? if ur answer is yes.. i m so sorry but u r nt fit to survive in the society and its time u tink bout ur future.. mayb try to dig up some money to set up a firm of urs in order for ppl to all abide to ur doings.. at tis pt of time.. i wld like to make clear a ting.. by saein all e above.. i dont mean 4H is wad u potrayed it to b.. a broken family with no unity. NO! and i make my stand clear tt if i were to see a single sentence related to tt.. i WILL NOT hesitate to smack u right in ur face to wake u up frm ur sweet dreams.. i hope u understand tt under singapore's law.. citizens haf the right to prosecute ppl for defamation and i tink by living in singapore, u too shld abide to the law..
DEFAMATION ACT
(CHAPTER 75)
Unintentional defamation.7. —(1) A person who has published words alleged to be defamatory of another person may, if he claims that the words were published by him innocently in relation to that other person, make an offer of amends under this section; and in any such case —
(a) if the offer is accepted by the party aggrieved and is duly performed, no proceedings for libel or slander shall be taken or continued by that party against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question (but without prejudice to any cause of action against any other person jointly responsible for that publication);
(b) if the offer is not accepted by the party aggrieved, then, except as otherwise provided by this section, it shall be a defence, in any proceedings by him for libel or slander against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question, to prove that the words complained of were published by the defendant or were published by the defendant innocently in relation to the plaintiff and that the offer was made as soon as practicable after the defendant received notice that they were or might be defamatory of the plaintiff, and has not been withdrawn.
(2) An offer of amends under this section must be expressed to be made for the purposes of this section, and must be accompanied by an affidavit specifying the facts relied upon by the person making it to show that the words in question were published by him innocently in relation to the party aggrieved; and for the purposes of a defence under subsection (1) (b) no evidence, other than evidence of facts specified in the affidavit, shall be admissible on behalf of that person to prove that the words were so published.
(3) An offer of amends under this section shall be understood to mean an offer —
(a) in any case, to publish or join in the publication of a suitable correction of the words complained of, and a sufficient apology to the party aggrieved in respect of those words;
(b) where copies of a document or record containing the said words have been distributed by or with the knowledge of the person making the offer, to take such steps as are reasonably practicable on his part for notifying persons to whom copies have been so distributed that the words are alleged to be defamatory of the party aggrieved.
(4) Where an offer of amends under this section is accepted by the party aggrieved —
(a) any question as to the steps to be taken in fulfilment of the offer as so accepted shall in default of agreement between the parties be referred to and determined by the High Court, whose decision shall be final;
(b) the power of the court to make orders as to costs in proceedings by the party aggrieved against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question, or in proceedings in respect of the offer under paragraph (a), shall include power to order the payment by the person making the offer to the party aggrieved of costs on an indemnity basis and any expenses reasonably incurred or to be incurred by that party in consequence of the publication in question;
and if no such proceedings as aforesaid are taken, the High Court may, upon application made by the party aggrieved, make any such order for the payment of such costs and expenses as aforesaid as could be made in such proceedings.
(5) For the purposes of this section, words shall be treated as published by one person (referred to in this subsection as the publisher) innocently in relation to another person if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) that the publisher did not intend to publish them of and concerning that other person, and did not know of circumstances by virtue of which they might be understood to refer to him; or
(b) that the words were not defamatory on the face of them, and the publisher did not know of circumstances by virtue of which they might be understood to be defamatory of that other person;
and in either case that the publisher exercised all reasonable care in relation to the publication; and any reference in this subsection to the publisher shall be construed as including a reference to any servant or agent of his who was concerned with the contents of the publication.
(6) Subsection (1) (b) shall not apply in relation to the publication by any person of words of which he is not the author unless he proves that the words were written by the author without malice.
if kok can get in y cant u? if fred can get in y cant u? if others can mix along well with the rest of the class.. y cant u? mayb its time to relfect upon urself.. if the above to u is not in the right tone.. i m so sorry but mayb my command of language doesnt suit u too.. n i m realli sorry for the fact tt i didnt put in more effort in perfecting my english writing skills... i seek ur forgiveness.. thank you
on 26/02/07.. someone smsed me... "hey! will u b pissed if someone went to ur blog to tag tt u sux and u are a sucker?" my very first thought was tt.. will someone of our age b so childish? but with a 2nd thought.. i thought.. y not? so out of curiosity.. i switched on my dearest com, into my beloved blog.. jux to see some stains on my veri tagboard.. it is at tis veri moment tt i tot.. mayb its time to comment a little of wad is said... and mayb gif a little piece of advise to some ppl whu r blinded to the reality of the world.. but before doing so.. i would like to extend my most sincere apology to xue weijian.. for not turning up on the dae of what is to him the most important reunion dinner.. i m here to apologise not bcux i did sth wrong.. but tt i failed to do the simplest favour for my dedicated friend.. but i hereby would like to sae i did not turn up not cux i didnt wan to.. but i knew i cant.. the fact tt i haf been out late for too mani daes tt week and tt an overnight stay out is something tt is not allowed in our family policy... i m sorry.. but remember.. if i were to turn up for ani upcoming outings of 2D.. it is not bcux of anione.. but u.. cux i know u r trying ur veri best to make the class come together and i promise.. i will try to..
Going back to the recent hot topic.. i seriously nd to sae.. i m nt someone whu knows how to sae no.. and weijian shld noe.. cux i didnt dare to sae no to him wen he asked if i m gng for the dinner.. but some other person whu called, made me said tt 2 letter word.. nt bcux of anithing.. but i seriously find no reason of being demanded to do something.. i believe in this democratic world of ours. we still have the most basic right to make our own decisions.. and whats more.. i owe u nothing.. so i doubt tt u have anithing to demand from me... if i m wrong.. i m sorry but to hereby seek ur forgiveness..
but i would like to appeal to u... to the point tt i seriously hope tt such a childish act will nt carry on.. and tt i wld not nd to type animore entries wif regards to such childish acts of urs... i hope u will understand tt there is no use comparing between 2 classes cux each of the classes haf their own positive and negative points.. and i strongly believe tt nothing in this world is perfect.. unless mayb u tink fairy tales do exist in real world.. the fact tt u may see one class better than the others is bcux u r blinded to the negative side of one but exposed to the negative side of the other.. positive points are much attainable frm the class of 4H and i see no reason whats more to demand.. if u would realise.. its onli u who is moaning and groaning.. and i can tell u.. there is no use in doing so.. i hope u can see the fact tt since others are okay and living on fine with current situation and u cant.. there shld b something tt lies wrong wif u.. and not the class.. i hope u can see tt it is easier for one person to change for the class than for the class to change for one person.. and seriously.. i dun find a necessity for the class to change into a desired outlook of urs... everyone in this world haf different expectations in life.. and we cant possibly satisfy everyone.. u mite sae tis is unfair.. but pls.. its time to tink back.. its time to grow up and graciously accept the fact tt nothing in this world is fair... there is no point moaning and groaning brooding over the past.. time ticks on even without u.. so it is at ur loss if u choose to stick to the fact tt the world shld put on the desired look of urs because.. tis will never happen.. i tink such complains about classes are jux a childish act tt ought to b changed.. haf u ever realise tt u r entitled to tis priviledge to complain abt tis class wif some ppl whu bothers to talk sense to u [which apparently didnt seem to get into ur head].. if tis were to happen in a company tt u r working for.. m i to assume tt u will do the same complaining through blogs and stuffs..? if ur answer is yes.. i m so sorry but u r nt fit to survive in the society and its time u tink bout ur future.. mayb try to dig up some money to set up a firm of urs in order for ppl to all abide to ur doings.. at tis pt of time.. i wld like to make clear a ting.. by saein all e above.. i dont mean 4H is wad u potrayed it to b.. a broken family with no unity. NO! and i make my stand clear tt if i were to see a single sentence related to tt.. i WILL NOT hesitate to smack u right in ur face to wake u up frm ur sweet dreams.. i hope u understand tt under singapore's law.. citizens haf the right to prosecute ppl for defamation and i tink by living in singapore, u too shld abide to the law..
DEFAMATION ACT
(CHAPTER 75)
Unintentional defamation.7. —(1) A person who has published words alleged to be defamatory of another person may, if he claims that the words were published by him innocently in relation to that other person, make an offer of amends under this section; and in any such case —
(a) if the offer is accepted by the party aggrieved and is duly performed, no proceedings for libel or slander shall be taken or continued by that party against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question (but without prejudice to any cause of action against any other person jointly responsible for that publication);
(b) if the offer is not accepted by the party aggrieved, then, except as otherwise provided by this section, it shall be a defence, in any proceedings by him for libel or slander against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question, to prove that the words complained of were published by the defendant or were published by the defendant innocently in relation to the plaintiff and that the offer was made as soon as practicable after the defendant received notice that they were or might be defamatory of the plaintiff, and has not been withdrawn.
(2) An offer of amends under this section must be expressed to be made for the purposes of this section, and must be accompanied by an affidavit specifying the facts relied upon by the person making it to show that the words in question were published by him innocently in relation to the party aggrieved; and for the purposes of a defence under subsection (1) (b) no evidence, other than evidence of facts specified in the affidavit, shall be admissible on behalf of that person to prove that the words were so published.
(3) An offer of amends under this section shall be understood to mean an offer —
(a) in any case, to publish or join in the publication of a suitable correction of the words complained of, and a sufficient apology to the party aggrieved in respect of those words;
(b) where copies of a document or record containing the said words have been distributed by or with the knowledge of the person making the offer, to take such steps as are reasonably practicable on his part for notifying persons to whom copies have been so distributed that the words are alleged to be defamatory of the party aggrieved.
(4) Where an offer of amends under this section is accepted by the party aggrieved —
(a) any question as to the steps to be taken in fulfilment of the offer as so accepted shall in default of agreement between the parties be referred to and determined by the High Court, whose decision shall be final;
(b) the power of the court to make orders as to costs in proceedings by the party aggrieved against the person making the offer in respect of the publication in question, or in proceedings in respect of the offer under paragraph (a), shall include power to order the payment by the person making the offer to the party aggrieved of costs on an indemnity basis and any expenses reasonably incurred or to be incurred by that party in consequence of the publication in question;
and if no such proceedings as aforesaid are taken, the High Court may, upon application made by the party aggrieved, make any such order for the payment of such costs and expenses as aforesaid as could be made in such proceedings.
(5) For the purposes of this section, words shall be treated as published by one person (referred to in this subsection as the publisher) innocently in relation to another person if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) that the publisher did not intend to publish them of and concerning that other person, and did not know of circumstances by virtue of which they might be understood to refer to him; or
(b) that the words were not defamatory on the face of them, and the publisher did not know of circumstances by virtue of which they might be understood to be defamatory of that other person;
and in either case that the publisher exercised all reasonable care in relation to the publication; and any reference in this subsection to the publisher shall be construed as including a reference to any servant or agent of his who was concerned with the contents of the publication.
(6) Subsection (1) (b) shall not apply in relation to the publication by any person of words of which he is not the author unless he proves that the words were written by the author without malice.
Justification.8. In an action for libel or slander in respect of words containing two or more distinct charges against the plaintiff, a defence of justification shall not fail by reason only that the truth of every charge is not proved if the words not proved to be true do not materially injure the plaintiff’s reputation having regard to the truth of the remaining charges.
if kok can get in y cant u? if fred can get in y cant u? if others can mix along well with the rest of the class.. y cant u? mayb its time to relfect upon urself.. if the above to u is not in the right tone.. i m so sorry but mayb my command of language doesnt suit u too.. n i m realli sorry for the fact tt i didnt put in more effort in perfecting my english writing skills... i seek ur forgiveness.. thank you
